Well, this is going to be complicated.
As I wrote at the outset of this project, one of the policy/planning questions that needs to be addressed is
how many four-year-old children live in Davidson County? Generating a smart estimate has turned out to be more complex than I anticipated initially.
In short, no wonder nobody has tackled this process before!
Turns out, isn't really the responsibility of any one particular government entity to track children in this age cohort. Or, rather, lots of entities track
some of these kiddos, but nobody tracks
all of them. So I need to bring the relevant data together and build the model myself.
Initially, my plan was to (a) fit kindergarten enrollment numbers, by year and by school cluster, and then (b) use that model as a proxy for the number of five-year-old children who would have been eligible for four-year-old (universal, voluntary) pre-K had it been in place in the previous year. From this figure I could determine trend lines for PK need, and predict/forecast But as I discovered, there are some characteristics of the data itself that will necessitate adjustments to the plan.
School Geography is a Cluster...
Before you scold me for the pun implied above, you need to know that MNPS is organized into twelve geographically delineated units called "clusters" -- a zoned high school, and its feeder elementary and middle schools. You can access the (updated as needed)
cluster maps on the district website, but here is how the clusters were organized in AY1314
(1):
Each of the clusters can include zoned and charter schools alike. If you open it in another window, you can zoom in, etc. The colors alone should give you a sense of how these clusters are jumbled across the county.